header-logo header-logo

22 October 2025
Issue: 8136 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Legal services , Consumer , Litigation funding
printer mail-detail

Solicitors’ regulator sanctioned for failures

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) must overhaul its complaints and risk assessment processes to fix ‘systemic shortcomings’, the Legal Services Consumer Panel has said

The panel called for ‘clear safeguards’ for clients involved in ‘high-risk legal arrangements, including litigation funding’ this week, in its response to Legal Services Board (LSB) moves to sanction the SRA for failing to protect thousands of clients affected by the collapse of law firm SSB Group.

An LSB-commissioned independent review by Northern Ireland firm Carson McDowell, published last week, found the SRA did not act effectively or efficiently in the five years leading to the collapse of the Sheffield firm despite receiving more than 100 reports.

It found the SRA did not take all the steps it could have taken, which meant it failed adequately to protect consumers, the public interest and professional standards.

The LSB will impose two sanctions on the SRA—a public censure and performance targets and monitoring.

SSB Group, which acted for thousands of clients in high-volume civil litigation claims, mainly relating to cavity wall insulation, went into administration in January 2024 owing £200m to litigation funders and other creditors. Many of its clients were subsequently pursued for adverse legal costs, despite having been assured their claims were ‘no win no fee’.

Catherine Brown, interim chair of the LSB, said: ‘The former clients of SSB have suffered profound emotional and financial harm.’

Law Society president Mark Evans said: ‘The report lays bare a lack of leadership and oversight of regulatory procedures and processes at the SRA.

‘This is despite knowing the risks posed by bulk cavity wall insulation cases, the previous failure of Pure Legal from which the SRA transferred clients to SSB, and multiple reports from MPs, other lawyers, industry and the victims themselves. A key concern must be the treatment of vulnerable victims by the SRA.

‘This cannot just be about improving systems and processes but requires culture change and focused leadership.’

Anna Bradley, chair of the SRA, said: ‘We are sorry that we did not act more quickly in relation to SSB… We fully accept the recommendations of this review.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll