header-logo header-logo

17 October 2016
Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Criminal Finances Bill

Companies which fail to prevent tax evasion may be subject to a criminal offence, under new anti-corruption legislation.

The Criminal Finances Bill, introduced in Parliament by the Home Secretary last week, aims to tackle money laundering and corruption, and recover the proceeds of crime and counter terrorist financing.

It introduces “unexplained wealth orders”, which can be authorised by the High court and will force persons suspected of serious crime to explain where their wealth came from or risk having it seized. Law enforcement officers will be given powers to seize precious metals and stones and works of art as well as illicit funds in bank accounts.

Regulated bodies will take steps to more widely share information, such as the data on financial transactions. Disclosure orders will be extended to money laundering and terrorist financing cases, requiring disclosure where someone is suspected of having information or documents relevant to an investigation.

Jonathan Pickworth, white collar crime partner at White & Case, said: “Twenty years ago the focus of anti-money laundering law was the proceeds of drug trafficking and the laundering of cash. 

“These days, the focus has shifted to PEPs (politically exposed persons) and grand corruption, particularly for the City of London. The introduction of unexplained wealth orders will continue this focus on PEPs, though the orders will also be available regarding serious crime.”

Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll