header-logo header-logo

17 October 2016
Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Criminal Finances Bill

Companies which fail to prevent tax evasion may be subject to a criminal offence, under new anti-corruption legislation.

The Criminal Finances Bill, introduced in Parliament by the Home Secretary last week, aims to tackle money laundering and corruption, and recover the proceeds of crime and counter terrorist financing.

It introduces “unexplained wealth orders”, which can be authorised by the High court and will force persons suspected of serious crime to explain where their wealth came from or risk having it seized. Law enforcement officers will be given powers to seize precious metals and stones and works of art as well as illicit funds in bank accounts.

Regulated bodies will take steps to more widely share information, such as the data on financial transactions. Disclosure orders will be extended to money laundering and terrorist financing cases, requiring disclosure where someone is suspected of having information or documents relevant to an investigation.

Jonathan Pickworth, white collar crime partner at White & Case, said: “Twenty years ago the focus of anti-money laundering law was the proceeds of drug trafficking and the laundering of cash. 

“These days, the focus has shifted to PEPs (politically exposed persons) and grand corruption, particularly for the City of London. The introduction of unexplained wealth orders will continue this focus on PEPs, though the orders will also be available regarding serious crime.”

Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll