header-logo header-logo

CRIMINAL LAW

14 March 2008
Issue: 7321 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v W Stevenson & Sons (A Partnership) and others [2008] EWCA Crim 273, [2008] All ER (D) 351 (Feb)

In so far as business activities are conducted in the name of a partnership and the partnership has identifiable assets that are distinct from the personal assets of each partner, there is no reason why a partnership should not be treated, for the purposes of the criminal law, as a separate entity from the partners who are members of it.

The question of whether or not the context permits the word “person” in a criminal statute to be read as including a partnership, might depend critically upon whether or not there is some restriction upon the assets that would properly be available to meet any penalty imposed.

Legislation that renders a partnership liable as an independent entity will lead, in respect of a conviction for a single offence, to the imposition of a single penalty. Conviction of the partnership will not constitute conviction of the individual partners, nor render the individual partners liable to individual penalties.

Where

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll