header-logo header-logo

Criminal legal aid: make or break?

29 July 2022 / Veronica Cowan
Issue: 7989 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
89126
Veronica Cowan reports on the ongoing strikes by criminal barristers: what will it take to repair a broken system?
  • Since June, members of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) have been undertaking industrial action following years of damagingly low legal aid funding.
  • The government’s latest proposal for a 15% fee increase remains unacceptable to the CBA given that the rise does not apply to the extensive backlog of existing cases.

Barristers specialising in criminal law in England and Wales began a series of strikes over legal aid funding on Monday 27 June, and there have been several days of court walkouts between Monday 18 and Friday 22 July. Members of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) assert that their legal aid case funding is too low, and they are calling for a 25% increase. The CBA, which represents criminal barristers in England and Wales, announced the strikes after a ballot of members. It said 81.5% of its more than 2,000 members supported industrial action. The strategic timing of the action could not be worse for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll