header-logo header-logo

Criminal legal aid: make or break?

29 July 2022 / Veronica Cowan
Issue: 7989 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
89126
Veronica Cowan reports on the ongoing strikes by criminal barristers: what will it take to repair a broken system?
  • Since June, members of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) have been undertaking industrial action following years of damagingly low legal aid funding.
  • The government’s latest proposal for a 15% fee increase remains unacceptable to the CBA given that the rise does not apply to the extensive backlog of existing cases.

Barristers specialising in criminal law in England and Wales began a series of strikes over legal aid funding on Monday 27 June, and there have been several days of court walkouts between Monday 18 and Friday 22 July. Members of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) assert that their legal aid case funding is too low, and they are calling for a 25% increase. The CBA, which represents criminal barristers in England and Wales, announced the strikes after a ballot of members. It said 81.5% of its more than 2,000 members supported industrial action. The strategic timing of the action could not be worse for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll