header-logo header-logo

29 July 2022 / Veronica Cowan
Issue: 7989 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Criminal legal aid: make or break?

89126
Veronica Cowan reports on the ongoing strikes by criminal barristers: what will it take to repair a broken system?
  • Since June, members of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) have been undertaking industrial action following years of damagingly low legal aid funding.
  • The government’s latest proposal for a 15% fee increase remains unacceptable to the CBA given that the rise does not apply to the extensive backlog of existing cases.

Barristers specialising in criminal law in England and Wales began a series of strikes over legal aid funding on Monday 27 June, and there have been several days of court walkouts between Monday 18 and Friday 22 July. Members of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) assert that their legal aid case funding is too low, and they are calling for a 25% increase. The CBA, which represents criminal barristers in England and Wales, announced the strikes after a ballot of members. It said 81.5% of its more than 2,000 members supported industrial action. The strategic timing of the action could not be worse

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll