header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
29 July 2022 / Veronica Cowan
Issue: 7989 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Criminal legal aid: make or break?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
89126
Veronica Cowan reports on the ongoing strikes by criminal barristers: what will it take to repair a broken system?
  • Since June, members of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) have been undertaking industrial action following years of damagingly low legal aid funding.
  • The government’s latest proposal for a 15% fee increase remains unacceptable to the CBA given that the rise does not apply to the extensive backlog of existing cases.

Barristers specialising in criminal law in England and Wales began a series of strikes over legal aid funding on Monday 27 June, and there have been several days of court walkouts between Monday 18 and Friday 22 July. Members of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) assert that their legal aid case funding is too low, and they are calling for a 25% increase. The CBA, which represents criminal barristers in England and Wales, announced the strikes after a ballot of members. It said 81.5% of its more than 2,000 members supported industrial action. The strategic timing of the action could not be worse

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll