header-logo header-logo

09 March 2007
Issue: 7263 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

R v H (Interlocutory application: Disclosure) [2007] UKHL 7, [2007] All ER (D) 377 (Feb)

A judge who is considering whether to hold a preparatory hearing under the Criminal Justice Act 1987 (CJA 1987), s 7 has only to decide whether a substantial benefit, for one of the purposes listed under sub-s (1), would arise from determining the relevant issues at a preparatory hearing, rather than after a jury had been empanelled.

The judge may determine other interlocutory applications at the same time as the preparatory hearing, but there is no appeal to the Court of Appeal, under CJA 1987, s 9(11), unless the matter for determination falls within s 9(3). It follows that an order in determination of an application for disclosure under the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, s 8 would qualify for an appeal under CJA 1987, s 9(11) if it involves the determination of a question of law relating to the case.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll