header-logo header-logo

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

09 March 2007
Issue: 7263 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v H (Interlocutory application: Disclosure) [2007] UKHL 7, [2007] All ER (D) 377 (Feb)

A judge who is considering whether to hold a preparatory hearing under the Criminal Justice Act 1987 (CJA 1987), s 7 has only to decide whether a substantial benefit, for one of the purposes listed under sub-s (1), would arise from determining the relevant issues at a preparatory hearing, rather than after a jury had been empanelled.

The judge may determine other interlocutory applications at the same time as the preparatory hearing, but there is no appeal to the Court of Appeal, under CJA 1987, s 9(11), unless the matter for determination falls within s 9(3). It follows that an order in determination of an application for disclosure under the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, s 8 would qualify for an appeal under CJA 1987, s 9(11) if it involves the determination of a question of law relating to the case.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll