header-logo header-logo

09 March 2007
Issue: 7263 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

R v H (Interlocutory application: Disclosure) [2007] UKHL 7, [2007] All ER (D) 377 (Feb)

A judge who is considering whether to hold a preparatory hearing under the Criminal Justice Act 1987 (CJA 1987), s 7 has only to decide whether a substantial benefit, for one of the purposes listed under sub-s (1), would arise from determining the relevant issues at a preparatory hearing, rather than after a jury had been empanelled.

The judge may determine other interlocutory applications at the same time as the preparatory hearing, but there is no appeal to the Court of Appeal, under CJA 1987, s 9(11), unless the matter for determination falls within s 9(3). It follows that an order in determination of an application for disclosure under the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, s 8 would qualify for an appeal under CJA 1987, s 9(11) if it involves the determination of a question of law relating to the case.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
A child’s views can be taken into account during international child abduction proceedings, the Supreme Court has held
Small and medium-sized law firms have urged regulators to pause plans to exclude owner-managers from compliance officer roles
Lawyers have raised the alarm on employment tribunal delays and backlogs, with some cases facing a three-year wait for a hearing
The controversial assisted dying Bill has drawn to a halt after MPs defeated it by 286 votes to 270
MPs have called for legislation to protect against the human rights risks of artificial intelligence (AI)
back-to-top-scroll