header-logo header-logo

13 June 2014 / David Short
Issue: 7610 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Crossing the line

David Short examines the possibility of the relatives of mesothelioma victims making claims north of the border

Many of the victims of asbestos induced mesothelioma in England and Wales spent part of their working life in Scotland. Shipyard workers from the north east of England appear to have regularly worked in the shipyards in Glasgow. In doing so they would have suffered exposure to asbestos in the Glasgow yards.

If there was material negligent exposure to asbestos in Scotland, and there has been a concluded litigation in England or Wales by the primary victim and spouse, it is possible for the extended family to raise a second action in Scotland for damages within three years (there are proposals contained in the Court Reform Bill to extend this period to five years) from the death of the primary victim.

Prior to 2006, if a primary victim had settled his or her case during life, the relatives entitled to damages for the death were barred from claiming.

In mesothelioma cases, where diagnosis inevitably means death within

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll