header-logo header-logo

Crossing the pond

22 November 2007 / Tom Epps
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Tom Epps highlights the increasing Americanisation of UK corporate crime investigations

The ongoing BA/Virgin cartel case sharply brings into focus the strong influence that US law enforcement agencies have imposed on corporate crime investigations in the UK. The influence of the US can be seen in both the investigative methods adopted by law enforcement agencies here, and more obviously in relation to the prospect of extradition to the US for the four former BA directors.

US-STYLE INVESTIGATIONS

Historically, the UK law enforcement agencies have been reluctant to grant immunity against prosecution to those who have admitted offences, even though they are willing to give evidence against others. The UK criminal courts have generally viewed any evidence of an accomplice with scepticism on the basis that they may simply seek to serve their own ends by providing evidence against others.

The US law enforcement agencies have traditionally favoured the practice of using those who admit offences to provide evidence against others in exchange for a substantially reduced sentence or immunity for the whistleblower.

The US

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll