header-logo header-logo

08 February 2024
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Crowell & Moring—Rafi Azim-Khan

Digital lawyer joins the firm’s London and San Francisco offices

Rafi Azim-Khan has joined Crowell & Moring to lead the firm’s digital law practice in Europe and advise clients on cybersecurity, data privacy, artificial intelligence, intellectual property, e-commerce, and advertising and marketing matters.

Azim-Khan previously led Pillsbury’s European privacy and marketing law practices and was co-head of the firm’s global privacy & cybersecurity practice. He has in-depth global experience from more than two decades working with Silicon Valley and international clients, launching new platforms, products or technology.

Commenting on his appointment, Azim-Khan said: ‘Crowell has a premier privacy and cyber security practice and is well-positioned to advise clients on the unprecedented onslaught of new digital, AI and consumer laws around the world, but particularly in the UK and EU.

‘It also has top-tier IP, brand and advertising lawyers, which will enhance service capability for the international new product launch and marketing projects I advise on. I look forward to helping grow the global reach of the firm by collaborating across borders, continents and offices.’

Jeffrey Poston, co-chair of Crowell’s privacy and cybersecurity group, said: ‘Rafi is a global powerhouse who brings notable experience in the AI, privacy and cybersecurity spaces, as well as in advertising, IP protection and e-commerce. He immediately adds breadth and experience to our group at a time of increasing regulation of our clients in Europe as well as the United States.’

Robert Weekes, managing partner of the firm’s London office and a member of the management board, said: ‘I am delighted to welcome Rafi to our ever-growing London team. Rafi’s appointment continues our approach of recruiting excellent partners that can work seamlessly for our clients across all of our geographies. Rafi’s arrival further enhances London’s global connections, particularly with the West Coast of the US and with our excellent teams in Brussels and Doha.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Megan Bradbury

Clarke Willmott—Megan Bradbury

Corporate team welcomes paralegal in Southampton

Howard Kennedy—Paul Moran

Howard Kennedy—Paul Moran

London firm strengthens real estate team with partner appointment

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll