header-logo header-logo

01 January 2009 / Gregory Mitchell
Issue: 7350+7351 / Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail

Crunch time

Gregory Mitchell QC suggests who should be held to account for excess remuneration in the credit crunch

There has been a great deal of political and media interest in the issue of bonus payments in the UK and internationally. The chancellor of the exchequer was quoted at the last Labour Party conference as saying: “We need to look as well at the culture of huge bonuses which have distorted the way decisions are made. It’s essential that bonuses don’t result in people being encouraged to take on more and more risk without understanding the damage that might be done, not just to their bank, but to the rest of us in the wider economy.”
Central banks and governments all over the world are bailing out banks, financial institutions and other large companies with loans and working capital. The recipients of government assistance—under new management— are bound to review substantial payments made and the conduct of their former senior executives—in creating the circumstances where rescue was required.
The corporate casualty list is likely to lengthen. Many medium

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Firm adds former Simmons Simmons patent head to engineering and tech team

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

Freeths strengthens its voice in national disputes with ACTAPS committee appointment

Pillsbury—Matthew Sperry

Pillsbury—Matthew Sperry

Pillsbury expands private client and family office platform with Cadwalader partner hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll