header-logo header-logo

09 May 2025 / Georgina Squire , Camilla Pratt
Issue: 8115 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Crunching the numbers

217839
Georgina Squire and Camilla Pratt explain how the business and property costs budgeting pilot will work in practice
  • Three three-year costs budgeting pilot schemes were introduced in April, aiming to provide a more tailored approach to costs management in litigation.
  • The pilots distinguish claims by value.

It is not disputed that the profession accepts costs management has led to progress in discipline and understanding around costs. However, there is a general view that it is those running the litigation who are better placed to anticipate the likely costs (particularly in high value claims) as the party with in-depth knowledge of the claim and the potential litigation strategies likely to be deployed. The constraints of having to apply to increase a budget only where there is good reason is felt particularly by those running high value acrimonious disputes.

Practitioners are, therefore, very likely to welcome the new pilot schemes introduced on 1 April, which are intended to continue until 1 April 2028. The purpose of the pilot schemes (which

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll