header-logo header-logo

Crypto law: not clear cut?

09 February 2024 / Sam Healey
Issue: 8058 / Categories: Features , Profession , Crypto , Cybercrime , Cyber
printer mail-detail
157343
Sam Healey explores the legal liabilities of crypto platforms in digital transactions
  • Cryptocurrencies present a range of challenges, including jurisdictional issues and identifying wrongdoers and liability.
  • Crypto platforms must comply with anti–money laundering (AML) regulations and be registered with the FCA. But more legal clarity is needed.

In the rapidly evolving world of cryptocurrencies, questions of legality and responsibility are beginning to take centre stage. One of the most prominent among these concerns is the liability of cryptocurrency platforms when investors are scammed or their cryptoassets are stolen.

To shed light on this topic, we must first outline the duties and responsibilities these platforms bear, and explain what rights and avenues for recompense an investor might have in the aftermath of a scam that targets digital assets.

Cryptoasset exchange providers are virtual spaces where users can trade, hold or sell their cryptoassets. They are similar to traditional financial institutions in some aspects, although distinct in operation given the nature of how the business takes place. So the question of liability

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll