01 July 2010 / Nicholas Dobson

Issue: 7424 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public , Human rights , Community care

printer

mail-detail

Cutprice caring?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Local authorities can’t afford to prioritise resources over the interests of those in care, says Nicholas Dobson

Given the inevitable severe cuts in public expenditure, what is to become of those placed in costly care homes at public expense? Will local authorities be able to move such residents to more cost-effective accommodation without falling foul of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) and consequent obligations under the Human Rights Act 1998?

Some support to authorities faced with such difficult decisions was given recently by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). This, however, was provided that authorities deal with such matters with care and context sensitivity to relevant Convention rights. The case in question was Watts v UK [2010] ECHR 793 judgment in which was given on 4 May 2010.

Closure of care home

Ms Watts (the applicant) was born in 1903. Some five years ago when no longer able to take care of her needs in her own home, she moved to Underhill House. This is a residential establishment

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Cutprice caring?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Local authorities can’t afford to prioritise resources over the interests of those in care, says Nicholas Dobson

Given the inevitable severe cuts in public expenditure, what is to become of those placed in costly care homes at public expense? Will local authorities be able to move such residents to more cost-effective accommodation without falling foul of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) and consequent obligations under the Human Rights Act 1998?

Some support to authorities faced with such difficult decisions was given recently by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). This, however, was provided that authorities deal with such matters with care and context sensitivity to relevant Convention rights. The case in question was Watts v UK [2010] ECHR 793 judgment in which was given on 4 May 2010.

Closure of care home

Ms Watts (the applicant) was born in 1903. Some five years ago when no longer able to take care of her needs in her own home, she moved to Underhill House. This is a residential establishment

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS

NLJ this week: Appeal court reins in ‘wrong defendant’ switcheroo

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

NLJ this week: Driving test fraudsters steer towards jail

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year

NLJ this week: Deepfakes demand data law muscle

As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR

NLJ this week: 40% penalty for coercive control

In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473

NLJ this week: Mbappé row spotlights ‘ethics bonuses’

A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

back-to-top-scroll