header-logo header-logo

Cutting back?

08 December 2011 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan examines the possibilities of reducing expert costs after Jackson

Litigation is too expensive. No part of the process is sacrosanct and it is clear that, for a variety of reasons, those who provide expert evidence for civil litigation are going to be squeezed.

I was staggered to be told by the eminent senior junior, Simon Butler, that in many a case his fees for the entire litigation are as nothing compared to what the experts charge. This is a man who takes on the most challenging legal issues. What has gone wrong?

Capping costs

Twelve years ago the CPR arrived and within Pt 35 there is the express power to cap the costs of an expert that can be recovered from the paying party. Do you know of a case where this has happened? I do not.

Litigators must shoulder responsibility too. The most senior designated civil judge in the country told me of his utter despair when asked

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll