header-logo header-logo

08 December 2011 / Professor Dominic Regan
Issue: 7493 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Cutting back?

Dominic Regan examines the possibilities of reducing expert costs after Jackson

Litigation is too expensive. No part of the process is sacrosanct and it is clear that, for a variety of reasons, those who provide expert evidence for civil litigation are going to be squeezed.

I was staggered to be told by the eminent senior junior, Simon Butler, that in many a case his fees for the entire litigation are as nothing compared to what the experts charge. This is a man who takes on the most challenging legal issues. What has gone wrong?

Capping costs

Twelve years ago the CPR arrived and within Pt 35 there is the express power to cap the costs of an expert that can be recovered from the paying party. Do you know of a case where this has happened? I do not.

Litigators must shoulder responsibility too. The most senior designated civil judge in the country told me of his utter despair when asked

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll