header-logo header-logo

20 March 2026 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 8154 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , In Court , Criminal , Tribunals
printer mail-detail

Cutting jury trials

244927

Michael Zander KC on the Courts & Tribunals Bill

  • The Courts & Tribunals Bill seeks to reduce the crown court backlog by cutting jury trials, removing defendants’ right to elect jury trial and shifting more cases to magistrates or judge-only trials.
  • The Institute for Government warns the reforms rely on uncertain assumptions and may increase pressure on already backlogged magistrates’ courts.

The first seven clauses of the Courts and Tribunals Bill provide the framework for the government’s hope to reduce the backlog of Crown Court cases by way of a drastic reduction of trials by jury.

For an account of those provisions, see below. The Bill also contains provisions on other matters of less salience which are briefly mentioned at the end.

Second Reading

The Second Reading debate on the Bill took place on 10 March. There had been press speculation about a threatened revolt by Labour backbenchers. Karl Turner, MP for Kingston upon Hull East, the leader of the rebels, told the House that he

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll