header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
20 March 2026 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 8154 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , In Court , Criminal , Tribunals
printer mail-detail

Cutting jury trials

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
244927

Michael Zander KC on the Courts & Tribunals Bill
  • The Courts & Tribunals Bill seeks to reduce the crown court backlog by cutting jury trials, removing defendants’ right to elect jury trial and shifting more cases to magistrates or judge-only trials.
  • The Institute for Government warns the reforms rely on uncertain assumptions and may increase pressure on already backlogged magistrates’ courts.

The first seven clauses of the Courts and Tribunals Bill provide the framework for the government’s hope to reduce the backlog of Crown Court cases by way of a drastic reduction of trials by jury.

For an account of those provisions, see below. The Bill also contains provisions on other matters of less salience which are briefly mentioned at the end.

Second Reading

The Second Reading debate on the Bill took place on 10 March. There had been press speculation about a threatened revolt by Labour backbenchers. Karl Turner, MP for Kingston upon Hull East, the leader of the rebels, told the House that he

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur and more—inside the litigation frontline

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

NLJ this week: Social media bans for children spark legal dilemmas
Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform risks creating ‘forgotten freeholders’
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
NLJ this week: Court of Appeal clarifies when a claim truly begins
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
NLJ this week: Split FDRs could ease pressure—and boost settlements
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll