header-logo header-logo

20 March 2026 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 8154 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , In Court , Criminal , Tribunals
printer mail-detail

Cutting jury trials

244927

Michael Zander KC on the Courts & Tribunals Bill

  • The Courts & Tribunals Bill seeks to reduce the crown court backlog by cutting jury trials, removing defendants’ right to elect jury trial and shifting more cases to magistrates or judge-only trials.
  • The Institute for Government warns the reforms rely on uncertain assumptions and may increase pressure on already backlogged magistrates’ courts.

The first seven clauses of the Courts and Tribunals Bill provide the framework for the government’s hope to reduce the backlog of Crown Court cases by way of a drastic reduction of trials by jury.

For an account of those provisions, see below. The Bill also contains provisions on other matters of less salience which are briefly mentioned at the end.

Second Reading

The Second Reading debate on the Bill took place on 10 March. There had been press speculation about a threatened revolt by Labour backbenchers. Karl Turner, MP for Kingston upon Hull East, the leader of the rebels, told the House that he

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
Businesses are facing a ‘dramatic rise in prosecution risks’ as sweeping reforms to corporate criminal liability come into force, expanding the net of who can be held responsible for wrongdoing inside organisations
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
back-to-top-scroll