header-logo header-logo

Damage control

03 August 2012 / Hayley Mclorinan
Issue: 7525 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Hayley McLorinan tackles the issue of recoverable heads of loss between jurisdictions

Can an English court assess damages using the Fatal Accidents Act 1976 (FAA 1976) when the tortious act resulting in death occurred in Germany? No, said the Court of Appeal in Cox v Ergo Versicherung AG [2012] EWCA Civ 854, [2012] All ER (D) 168 (Jun), Dame Janet Smith dissenting.

The facts

Mrs Cox lived in Germany with her husband, Major Christopher Cox, where he was stationed with HM Forces. They were both UK nationals. In May 2004, Major Cox was killed while riding his bicycle when he was hit by a car. The car driver was a German national with a German registered insurance company. Mrs Cox returned to the UK in 2005.

It was not disputed that liability fell to be determined under German law, or that the matter could be heard in England. The dispute arose as to whether damages could be awarded to Mrs Cox under the English FAA 1976, which affords dependants the ability to claim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Firm grows London practice with two partner promotions

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Government contracts and procurement practice expands with London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll