24 February 2012 / Merryck Lowe

Issue: 7502 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Expert Witness , Bribery , Profession

printer

mail-detail

Damp squib or slow burner?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Merryck Lowe follows the progress of the Bribery Act six months down the line

The Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010) came into force on 1 July 2011 and has now been in force for six months. However, apart from the prosecution under BA 2010 of Munir Yakub Patel in relation to allegations of misconduct during his employment at Redbridge Magistrates’ Court, London, there has been no prosecution show-piece.

A let-down?

BA 2010 may therefore appear to be a damp squib and, after all the hype and presentations, something of a let-down, but there was no good reason to expect immediate fireworks or a colourful crown court show staged by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO). Assuming that companies and individuals believe they can be caught and will be prosecuted, the impact of BA 2010 will not occur over six months, nor even a year—its effect is much deeper and long term. Its impact will be felt in a decade or a generation, not in the bright courtroom excitement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Damp squib or slow burner?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Merryck Lowe follows the progress of the Bribery Act six months down the line

The Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010) came into force on 1 July 2011 and has now been in force for six months. However, apart from the prosecution under BA 2010 of Munir Yakub Patel in relation to allegations of misconduct during his employment at Redbridge Magistrates’ Court, London, there has been no prosecution show-piece.

A let-down?

BA 2010 may therefore appear to be a damp squib and, after all the hype and presentations, something of a let-down, but there was no good reason to expect immediate fireworks or a colourful crown court show staged by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO). Assuming that companies and individuals believe they can be caught and will be prosecuted, the impact of BA 2010 will not occur over six months, nor even a year—its effect is much deeper and long term. Its impact will be felt in a decade or a generation, not in the bright courtroom excitement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS

NLJ this week: Sanctions ruling casts ‘wide net’ over global finance

A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods

NLJ this week: England’s courts cement status as fraud battleground

Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide

NLJ this week: Mazur ruling puts firms on supervision alert

Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’

NLJ this week: Landlords’ forced entry powers spark legal divide

Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers

NLJ this week: Push to scrap ‘vague’ public office misconduct law

A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence

back-to-top-scroll