24 February 2012 / Merryck Lowe

Issue: 7502 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Expert Witness , Bribery , Profession

printer

mail-detail

Damp squib or slow burner?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Merryck Lowe follows the progress of the Bribery Act six months down the line

The Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010) came into force on 1 July 2011 and has now been in force for six months. However, apart from the prosecution under BA 2010 of Munir Yakub Patel in relation to allegations of misconduct during his employment at Redbridge Magistrates’ Court, London, there has been no prosecution show-piece.

A let-down?

BA 2010 may therefore appear to be a damp squib and, after all the hype and presentations, something of a let-down, but there was no good reason to expect immediate fireworks or a colourful crown court show staged by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO). Assuming that companies and individuals believe they can be caught and will be prosecuted, the impact of BA 2010 will not occur over six months, nor even a year—its effect is much deeper and long term. Its impact will be felt in a decade or a generation, not in the bright courtroom excitement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Damp squib or slow burner?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Merryck Lowe follows the progress of the Bribery Act six months down the line

The Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010) came into force on 1 July 2011 and has now been in force for six months. However, apart from the prosecution under BA 2010 of Munir Yakub Patel in relation to allegations of misconduct during his employment at Redbridge Magistrates’ Court, London, there has been no prosecution show-piece.

A let-down?

BA 2010 may therefore appear to be a damp squib and, after all the hype and presentations, something of a let-down, but there was no good reason to expect immediate fireworks or a colourful crown court show staged by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO). Assuming that companies and individuals believe they can be caught and will be prosecuted, the impact of BA 2010 will not occur over six months, nor even a year—its effect is much deeper and long term. Its impact will be felt in a decade or a generation, not in the bright courtroom excitement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Taylor Rose—Jessica Draganescu & Emily Hewlett

Taylor Rose—Jessica Draganescu & Emily Hewlett

Firm strengthens growth strategy and group litigation capability with senior hires

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS

NLJ this week: Is inequality undermining trust?

The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles

NLJ this week: Freemasons ruling backs police transparency over privacy claims

A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons

NLJ this week: Right to grieve marks ‘major shift’ in employment law

Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners

NLJ this week: AI privilege battles expose risks

Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost

NLJ this week: Experts warned—AI use must be transparent

New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’

back-to-top-scroll