header-logo header-logo

Damp squib or slow burner?

24 February 2012 / Merryck Lowe
Issue: 7502 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Expert Witness , Bribery , Profession
printer mail-detail

Merryck Lowe follows the progress of the Bribery Act six months down the line

The Bribery Act 2010 (BA 2010) came into force on 1 July 2011 and has now been in force for six months. However, apart from the prosecution under BA 2010 of Munir Yakub Patel in relation to allegations of misconduct during his employment at Redbridge Magistrates’ Court, London, there has been no prosecution show-piece.

A let-down?

BA 2010 may therefore appear to be a damp squib and, after all the hype and presentations, something of a let-down, but there was no good reason to expect immediate fireworks or a colourful crown court show staged by the Serious Fraud Office (SFO). Assuming that companies and individuals believe they can be caught and will be prosecuted, the impact of BA 2010 will not occur over six months, nor even a year—its effect is much deeper and long term. Its impact will be felt in a decade or a generation, not in the bright courtroom excitement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll