header-logo header-logo

13 February 2019 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7828 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Dangerous liaisons

Dominic Regan provides an updated cut out & keep guide to surviving sanctions

Somewhere, somehow, someone is in default. Where a sanction applies, they are in deep trouble. The 2013 Jackson reforms were intended to promote compliance, and that is why the measures about default and relief were rewritten.

Nasty traps

The most common default is the failure to serve witness statements in time. They are ubiquitous. Not every case requires a budget or expert evidence, but written factual evidence is a necessity. The nasty trap with witness statements is found in the underlying rule, CPR 32.10. Failure to serve in time means that one cannot call the witnesses unless forgiveness is obtained. The court order may be expressed in anodyne terms; the sting is lurking every time in the rule.

Appreciate that it could get even worse. The sanctions decision to beware of is Gladwin v Bogescu [2017] EWHC 1287 (QB), [2017] All ER (D) 104 (Jun), where Turner J—someone plainly destined for elevation to the Court of Appeal—struck out a liability

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll