header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
13 February 2019 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7828 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Dangerous liaisons

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
Dominic Regan provides an updated cut out & keep guide to surviving sanctions

Somewhere, somehow, someone is in default. Where a sanction applies, they are in deep trouble. The 2013 Jackson reforms were intended to promote compliance, and that is why the measures about default and relief were rewritten.

Nasty traps

The most common default is the failure to serve witness statements in time. They are ubiquitous. Not every case requires a budget or expert evidence, but written factual evidence is a necessity. The nasty trap with witness statements is found in the underlying rule, CPR 32.10. Failure to serve in time means that one cannot call the witnesses unless forgiveness is obtained. The court order may be expressed in anodyne terms; the sting is lurking every time in the rule.

Appreciate that it could get even worse. The sanctions decision to beware of is Gladwin v Bogescu [2017] EWHC 1287 (QB), [2017] All ER (D) 104 (Jun), where Turner J—someone plainly destined for elevation to the Court of Appeal—struck out a liability

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll