The first part of an exclusive NLJ series on controlling costs post-Mitchell using technology solutions, by Mark Surguy, Damian Murphy & Tracey Stretton
In Summit Navigation Ltd v Generali Romania Asigurare [2014] EWHC 398 (Comm), [2014] All ER (D) 202 (Feb) Leggett J stated that “all sanctions are [not] equal and are [not] to be treated as equivalent to one another for the purposes of CPR 3.9”. Mitchell v News Group Newspapers [2013] EWCA Civ 1537, [2014] 2 All ER 430 was a case about a late budget. Summit was about the late provision of security for costs. What is the sanction for a late or defective list of documents?
The imposition of sanctions for non compliance with the rules has been justified by the need for the efficient conduct of proceedings. In this context “efficiency” has been unhelpfully likened to just that: compliance with the rules. However, does this emphasis on compliance really lead to the required efficiency? And what about the effective conduct of litigation?
