header-logo header-logo

30 January 2019
Issue: 7826 / Categories: Legal News , Insurance / reinsurance , Brexit , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Data, trade & Brexit top risks for insurers

Data breaches, Brexit and the US/China trade war are the top legal risks for insurers, according to law firm RPC’s annual insurance review.

The firm’s report, published last week, warns that data breaches are increasingly likely to result in large group lawsuits backed by litigation funders, with potentially thousands of people affected. The impact of Brexit on supply chains and product liability insurance is another major concern—RPC advises product liability insurers to update policies as the final Brexit deal becomes clear because, if tariffs or border delays make EU products more expensive, manufacturers may source alternative components and product standards may suddenly change.

Third, RPC warns that politically-driven imposition of taxes and tariffs can be a grey area for political risk policies; therefore, both insured and insurers will need to keep on top of developments in the escalating US/China trade wars in 2019.

Simon Laird, global head of insurance at RPC, said: ‘Unpredictable developments in international politics could have a widespread effect on cross-border trade.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll