header-logo header-logo

A day in the life of a post-Jackson litigator (Pt 1)

Tracey Stretton & Mark Surguy offer some tips on litigation tactics in the post-Jackson world
 

The Jackson reforms brought disclosure practice in line with the regime that was already developing after the implementation of the Woolf reforms in 1999, culminating in the introduction of Practice Direction 31B to the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) in October 2010.

PD 31B aimed to encourage parties to collaborate over the scope of the search for relevant material. It was intended that the parties seek to agree an approach to disclosure. It was even stated that a report, or summary, setting out the areas of agreement and disagreement in relation to electronically stored information, should be provided at the case management conference (CMC).

All of these requirements are reiterated in the amended disclosure rules. For example, r 31(5)(3) requires a report describing the approach to be taken to disclosure. Similarly, the introduction of the “menu” approach to disclosure in the new r 31.5(7), really only emphasises

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll