header-logo header-logo

Day one rights: what happened?

251514
© Getty images
Was the promise actually delivered? Robert Hargreaves & Lily Johnston explain why employers must act now
  • The Employment Rights Act 2025 reduces the unfair dismissal qualifying period from two years to six months and abolishes the statutory cap on compensatory awards entirely. Both changes take effect on 1 January 2027.
  • Anyone hired from July 2026 onwards will acquire protection at the six-month mark, and the financial exposure attaching to unfair dismissal claims is fundamentally changed.

When we wrote in these pages in November 2025, the Employment Rights Bill’s headline promise was straightforward: unfair dismissal would become a day-one right, with a statutory ‘initial period of employment’ during which a lighter-touch process would apply (‘Day one rights: a new chapter?’ 175 NLJ 8141, pp11-12).

The Employment Rights Act 2025 (ERA 2025) does not deliver that. Parliamentary events in the final weeks of the Bill’s passage produced a framework that is more modest in one respect and considerably more radical in another.

From promise to compromise

The

To access this full article please fill the form below.
All fields are mandatory unless marked as 'Optional'.
If you already a subscriber to New Law Journal, please login here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll