header-logo header-logo

03 November 2023 / Jago Russell , Ross Ludlow
Issue: 8047 / Categories: Features , Banking
printer mail-detail

De-banking: the banks’ response to navigating a regulatory minefield

145194
Jago Russell and Ross Ludlow explain the reasons behind the trend for de-banking
  • Covers growing trend of banks to ‘de-bank’ customers in order to mitigate risk, which the Nigel Farage debacle highlighted.
  • Banks are expected to police these risks and face severe penalties if they do not, therefore may de-bank clients to protect themselves.

On 2 October 2023, HM Treasury announced ‘tougher rules to stamp out debanking’, promising a public consultation and legislative change in 2024. The announcement followed public concerns about the closure of Nigel Farage’s bank account at Coutts, on the basis of his personal and political views. Farage’s case is, however, just one example of a growing trend. Banks are becoming increasingly risk-averse, utilising their ability to ‘de-bank’ customers as a tool to mitigate a range of risks and to manage their regulatory burdens.

Losing access to banking facilities can have profound implications. Without access to a bank account, individuals and business may be unable to receive or pay salaries, to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll