header-logo header-logo

De-banking: the banks’ response to navigating a regulatory minefield

03 November 2023 / Jago Russell , Ross Ludlow
Issue: 8047 / Categories: Features , Banking
printer mail-detail
145194
Jago Russell and Ross Ludlow explain the reasons behind the trend for de-banking
  • Covers growing trend of banks to ‘de-bank’ customers in order to mitigate risk, which the Nigel Farage debacle highlighted.
  • Banks are expected to police these risks and face severe penalties if they do not, therefore may de-bank clients to protect themselves.

On 2 October 2023, HM Treasury announced ‘tougher rules to stamp out debanking’, promising a public consultation and legislative change in 2024. The announcement followed public concerns about the closure of Nigel Farage’s bank account at Coutts, on the basis of his personal and political views. Farage’s case is, however, just one example of a growing trend. Banks are becoming increasingly risk-averse, utilising their ability to ‘de-bank’ customers as a tool to mitigate a range of risks and to manage their regulatory burdens.

Losing access to banking facilities can have profound implications. Without access to a bank account, individuals and business may be unable to receive or pay salaries, to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll