header-logo header-logo

De-banking: the banks’ response to navigating a regulatory minefield

03 November 2023 / Jago Russell , Ross Ludlow
Issue: 8047 / Categories: Features , Banking
printer mail-detail
145194
Jago Russell and Ross Ludlow explain the reasons behind the trend for de-banking
  • Covers growing trend of banks to ‘de-bank’ customers in order to mitigate risk, which the Nigel Farage debacle highlighted.
  • Banks are expected to police these risks and face severe penalties if they do not, therefore may de-bank clients to protect themselves.

On 2 October 2023, HM Treasury announced ‘tougher rules to stamp out debanking’, promising a public consultation and legislative change in 2024. The announcement followed public concerns about the closure of Nigel Farage’s bank account at Coutts, on the basis of his personal and political views. Farage’s case is, however, just one example of a growing trend. Banks are becoming increasingly risk-averse, utilising their ability to ‘de-bank’ customers as a tool to mitigate a range of risks and to manage their regulatory burdens.

Losing access to banking facilities can have profound implications. Without access to a bank account, individuals and business may be unable to receive or pay salaries, to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
back-to-top-scroll