header-logo header-logo

Burial disputes: Dead & buried?

18 June 2021 / Alistair Spencer
Issue: 7937 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
51265
Alistair Spencer outlines the law underpinning & resolving burial disputes
  • Ownership of a body.
  • Ownership of ashes.
  • Intervention of the court in burial disputes.
  • Location of the burial.

The changing nature of society has led to disputes regarding funerals and the burial/cremation of bodies becoming more prevalent. The increase in second and third families, more dispersed families and more complex family relationships are some of the factors behind what appears to be an increase in disputes regarding bodies.

The death of a family member can bring out hidden rivalries and differing views as to the deceased’s wishes on a number of areas including funeral and burial arrangements, particularly if the deceased did not clearly set out their intentions.

Ownership of a body

When it comes to burial disputes the question of ownership of the deceased’s body often arises.

It was established in the case of R v Sharpe (1857) 21 JP 86 that the ‘law recognises no property in a corpse’. This was later cited in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll