header-logo header-logo

Burial disputes: Dead & buried?

18 June 2021 / Alistair Spencer
Issue: 7937 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
51265
Alistair Spencer outlines the law underpinning & resolving burial disputes
  • Ownership of a body.
  • Ownership of ashes.
  • Intervention of the court in burial disputes.
  • Location of the burial.

The changing nature of society has led to disputes regarding funerals and the burial/cremation of bodies becoming more prevalent. The increase in second and third families, more dispersed families and more complex family relationships are some of the factors behind what appears to be an increase in disputes regarding bodies.

The death of a family member can bring out hidden rivalries and differing views as to the deceased’s wishes on a number of areas including funeral and burial arrangements, particularly if the deceased did not clearly set out their intentions.

Ownership of a body

When it comes to burial disputes the question of ownership of the deceased’s body often arises.

It was established in the case of R v Sharpe (1857) 21 JP 86 that the ‘law recognises no property in a corpse’. This was later cited in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll