header-logo header-logo

Deal or no deal?

20 November 2008
Issue: 7346 / Categories: Features , Family , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail

Jonathan Herring discusses enforcing

As the family lawyer trudges home after many hours of work his heart is slightly lighter because the day involved a sensible negotiated settlement of a complex case. There were handshakes all round, and although no one was delighted, or even happy, there was a sense of relief that a deal had been struck that was just about acceptable to everyone. But our lawyer’s lightness of heart may be forgotten the next morning when greeted by news that the other side has decided to pull out of the agreement. Inevitably the client will want to know: are they allowed just to pull out of the agreement having shaken hands on it?

Consent orders
Well, yes, is the answer. Until the court makes a consent order, the agreement of the parties is not legally binding. That is why it is sensible to get a consent order made as soon as possible after the agreement has been reached. A judge might be persuaded that if a party pulls out of a negotiated settlement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll