header-logo header-logo

20 November 2008
Issue: 7346 / Categories: Features , Family , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail

Deal or no deal?

Jonathan Herring discusses enforcing

As the family lawyer trudges home after many hours of work his heart is slightly lighter because the day involved a sensible negotiated settlement of a complex case. There were handshakes all round, and although no one was delighted, or even happy, there was a sense of relief that a deal had been struck that was just about acceptable to everyone. But our lawyer’s lightness of heart may be forgotten the next morning when greeted by news that the other side has decided to pull out of the agreement. Inevitably the client will want to know: are they allowed just to pull out of the agreement having shaken hands on it?

Consent orders
Well, yes, is the answer. Until the court makes a consent order, the agreement of the parties is not legally binding. That is why it is sensible to get a consent order made as soon as possible after the agreement has been reached. A judge might be persuaded that if a party pulls out of a negotiated settlement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Switalskis—Sally Ann Masih, Suzy Overton & Jane Beaumont

Switalskis—Sally Ann Masih, Suzy Overton & Jane Beaumont

Trio of recruits strengthens Switalskis residential property team

Ward Hadaway—Steven Hayward

Ward Hadaway—Steven Hayward

Birmingham law firm appoints construction partner

Flint Bishop—six appointments

Flint Bishop—six appointments

Flint Bishop accelerates Northern growth through strategic senior appointments

NEWS
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
Jonathan Fisher KC’s wide-ranging fraud report contains worthwhile proposals, but turning them into workable reform will require money, capacity and political will
back-to-top-scroll