header-logo header-logo

04 April 2020
Issue: 7882 / Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Debevoise & Plimpton LLP—Jenny Wheater

Firm adds new international counsel to tax group

Debevoise & Plimpton LLP has announced that Jenny Wheater is joining the firm’s London office as an international counsel and member of the tax and private equity groups.

Ms Wheater advises clients on the tax aspects of establishing and operating various types of investment funds, including private equity, debt and real estate funds, and on a variety of private equity transactions such as secondaries.

A long-standing, prominent member of the London tax and investment management community, Ms Wheater sits on the British Venture Capital Association (BVCA) Tax Committee and on the Association of Real Estate Funds Brexit Working Group. Ms Wheater is admitted to practice in both England & Wales and New York.

Richard Ward, Chair of Debevoise’s UK tax practice, commented: ‘Private equity funds and their transactions are an important part of our tax practice. Welcoming Jenny into the team reconfirms our commitment to offer those fund clients the very best advice in the market. She is an outstanding lawyer, with a proven commitment not only to technical excellence, but also to influencing tax policy through high-level involvement in bodies such as the BVCA. I look forward to welcoming her into the team.’

Jenny Wheater, international counsel at Debevoise, commented: ‘I am excited to be joining the team at Debevoise. The tax environment for private equity has changed at a daunting pace in recent years, and so it has rarely been more important for funds to plan carefully for the challenges and opportunities that brings. Debevoise has been at the forefront of that change for some time, and I am looking forward to playing my part in the firm’s ongoing success.’

Issue: 7882 / Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll