header-logo header-logo

11 December 2008
Issue: 7349 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , CPR
printer mail-detail

A decade of CPR

Procedure

To mark the tenth anniversary of the introduction of the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) next year, NLJ will be running a series of articles on their impact inside the courts and out.

Peter Thompson QC, general editor of Th e Civil Court Practice, says that in
his Final Report on Access to Justice, Lord Woolf criticised existing procedures for being too expensive, complicated and slow, and for producing an inequality of arms between rich litigants and poor.

“Lord Woolf recommended simpler, unifi ed rules, more court control, free advice for litigants in person and greater use of IT.

“After 10 years since the new rules came in we can say confidently that most litigants in person have benefited enormously from the reforms,” Thompson adds.

Issue: 7349 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , CPR
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll