header-logo header-logo

01 January 2010
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Deemed service

To what extent can industrial action be taken into account when it has been responsible for a failure to comply with a case management time limit?

To what extent can the recent Royal Mail industrial action be taken into account when it has been responsible for a failure to comply with a case management time limit and a sanction has been triggered? Can the deemed service provisions of the CPR be disapplied? As industrial action was announced in advance, should service by post have been avoided or, if used, the likely disruption taken into account?

Civil matters are subject to the CPR and the overriding objective. This gives the court a wide discretion when dealing with the failure to comply with court orders. The court will take into consideration a frustrating event outside of the control of the litigant. However, the court will also bear in mind prior knowledge of such an event and any failure to reasonably avoid it.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll