header-logo header-logo

01 February 2013
Issue: 7546 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Defamation—Order for costs—Approach

KC v MGN Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 3, [2013] All ER (D) 140 (Jan)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Judge CJ, Lord Neuberger and Mr Justice Eady, 22 Jan 2013

If, following an appropriate apology, a claimant chooses to reject a clear and unequivocal offer of damages, and thus incurs additional legal expense himself, and requires the defendant to incur further expense, the burden of what proves to have been unnecessary legal expense should normally fall on the claimant.

James Dingemans QC and Julien Foster (instructed by YVA Solicitors) for the claimant. Desmond Browne QC and Yuli Takatsuki (instructed by MGN Legal Department) for the defendant.

The underlying proceedings involved an action in which the claimant argued that he had been libelled by an article in one of the defendant’s newspapers. The claimant obtained judgment and an order for damages and costs in his favour. The defendant then appealed successfully against the award of damages. The Court of Appeal reduced the judge’s starting point from £150,000 to £100,000.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll