header-logo header-logo

Default of acknowledgment of service

04 September 2008 / Janna Purdie
Issue: 7335 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Janna Purdie considers when the late acknowledgment of service by a defendant can prevent a claimant obtaining a default judgment

Default of acknowledgment of service

The court has held that where a defendant serves a late acknowledgment of service, he may be entitled to an extension of time to serve the acknowledgment together with a period of time in which to consult with his recently appointed lawyer prior to putting in a response to a summary judgment application by the claimant.

Facts of ESR Insurance Services v Clemons & ors

The claimant, ESR, an insurance broker, sought default judgments pursuant to CPR Part 12.3(1) against all the defendants. The claim was a Part 7 claim in the Commercial list and therefore by reason of CPR 58.8 there was no requirement for the claimant to serve particulars of claim prior to applying for or obtaining a default judgment.

One of the defendants, Mr Clemons, resided within the jurisdiction. He served an acknowledgment of service, albeit late. The other defendants all resided outside the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll