header-logo header-logo

06 August 2009
Issue: 7381 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Defence compensation review brought forward

The decision by the Ministry of Defence (MoD) to bring forward government plans to review the compensation paid to injured armed forces personnel has been welcomed by lawyers.

Last week, the secretary of defence, Bob Ainsworth, cut short his summer holiday in a bid to stem the tide of criticism levelled at his department for a Court of Appeal challenge to sums awarded to two servicemen.

Lance Corporal Anthony Duncan and Marine Matthew McWilliams sustained severe leg injuries in Iraq and during training respectively.

Both won large increases to the initial sum awarded in compensation under the armed forces compensation scheme, after they appealed to a tribunal.

The MoD issued the challenge to seek clarification over the payments made. A judgment is due to be made on that issue in October.

In a bid to quell public disquiet over the case, which followed a sharp increase in the number of deaths of servicemen in the Afghan conflict, Ainsworth announced that a review of the scheme was to be brought forward. “As defence secretary I cannot

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll