header-logo header-logo

Defence lawyers face dilemma on bids

01 October 2024
Issue: 8088 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Criminal defence solicitors have been left in the dark on rate rises while a shortage of family legal aid practitioners is forcing survivors of domestic abuse to represent themselves in court

Criminal defence firms are currently bidding for ten-year contracts due to start in October 2025, and have until 22 October to submit their applications to the Legal Aid Agency if they want to join a duty rota on the start date.

However, ministers have not yet published their response to the ‘Crime lower consultation’, which proposed reforms to the fee system for police station and youth court work. The consultation closed in March.

Neither has the Lord Chancellor outlined her response to the Law Society’s successful judicial review, R (on behalf of the Law Society) v Lord Chancellor [2024] EWHC 155 (Admin). The High Court held in January that former Lord Chancellor Dominic Raab acted irrationally and failed to make adequate enquiries when implementing Sir Christopher Bellamy’s Criminal Legal Aid Independent Review, which reported in 2021. Sir Christopher recommended an increase in defence solicitors’ legal aid rates of at least 15%.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said: ‘Both decisions are well overdue. How can firms make a sound business decision to bid for a new contract, especially one lasting ten years, without knowing whether these bare minimum criminal legal aid rate increases will ever happen?’

Emmerson also highlighted the impact on access to justice of solicitors leaving family and criminal legal aid due to the low fees, warning that 19% of legal aid firms have closed in the past five years.

The latest Family Court Statistics Quarterly, published last week, showed 1,555 survivors (29% of the total) made domestic abuse applications without legal representation between April and June. This is nearly double the number in 2011, when 15% were unrepresented.

Issue: 8088 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll