header-logo header-logo

01 October 2024
Issue: 8088 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Defence lawyers face dilemma on bids

Criminal defence solicitors have been left in the dark on rate rises while a shortage of family legal aid practitioners is forcing survivors of domestic abuse to represent themselves in court

Criminal defence firms are currently bidding for ten-year contracts due to start in October 2025, and have until 22 October to submit their applications to the Legal Aid Agency if they want to join a duty rota on the start date.

However, ministers have not yet published their response to the ‘Crime lower consultation’, which proposed reforms to the fee system for police station and youth court work. The consultation closed in March.

Neither has the Lord Chancellor outlined her response to the Law Society’s successful judicial review, R (on behalf of the Law Society) v Lord Chancellor [2024] EWHC 155 (Admin). The High Court held in January that former Lord Chancellor Dominic Raab acted irrationally and failed to make adequate enquiries when implementing Sir Christopher Bellamy’s Criminal Legal Aid Independent Review, which reported in 2021. Sir Christopher recommended an increase in defence solicitors’ legal aid rates of at least 15%.

Law Society president Nick Emmerson said: ‘Both decisions are well overdue. How can firms make a sound business decision to bid for a new contract, especially one lasting ten years, without knowing whether these bare minimum criminal legal aid rate increases will ever happen?’

Emmerson also highlighted the impact on access to justice of solicitors leaving family and criminal legal aid due to the low fees, warning that 19% of legal aid firms have closed in the past five years.

The latest Family Court Statistics Quarterly, published last week, showed 1,555 survivors (29% of the total) made domestic abuse applications without legal representation between April and June. This is nearly double the number in 2011, when 15% were unrepresented.

Issue: 8088 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll