header-logo header-logo

Defendant's DOB

07 October 2010
Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

The form of acknowledgement of service (revised form N9) contains a box in which...

The form of acknowledgement of service (revised form N9) contains a box in which the defendant is asked to record his date of birth. I have just had an acknowledgement rejected by the court because the box was not completed. I can find nothing in CPR 10 or PD10 which requires me to provide this information. Was the court correct?

The requirement to provide the date of birth, if known, is in PD16 para 10.7 and extends to provision of the date in an admission, defence, defence and counterclaim, reply or other response. Therefore, the court was correct. If the date of birth is unknown then this should be stated in the acknowledgement etc. It would be helpful if the requirement was mentioned or there was an appropriate cross-reference in PD 10.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
back-to-top-scroll