header-logo header-logo

Defendant's DOB

07 October 2010
Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

The form of acknowledgement of service (revised form N9) contains a box in which...

The form of acknowledgement of service (revised form N9) contains a box in which the defendant is asked to record his date of birth. I have just had an acknowledgement rejected by the court because the box was not completed. I can find nothing in CPR 10 or PD10 which requires me to provide this information. Was the court correct?

The requirement to provide the date of birth, if known, is in PD16 para 10.7 and extends to provision of the date in an admission, defence, defence and counterclaim, reply or other response. Therefore, the court was correct. If the date of birth is unknown then this should be stated in the acknowledgement etc. It would be helpful if the requirement was mentioned or there was an appropriate cross-reference in PD 10.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Human rights lawyers, social justice champion, co-founder of the law firm Bindmans, and NLJ columnist Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC has died at the age of 92 years
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
back-to-top-scroll