16 December 2011 / Carol Storer

Issue: 7494 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus

printer

mail-detail

Delaying the inevitable?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Does the government’s new schedule for legal aid reform provide hope or just delay? Carol Storer reports

The government has announced a delay in implementing the legal aid reforms. Does this mean that it has concerns over the passage of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO) Bill? Or is it simply a sensible scheduling decision?

Originally, the government hoped to bring in the cuts in civil categories next October. However, the LASPO Bill will only become an Act at the earliest in March 2012, assuming it is passed in some shape or form. The Ministry of Justice refers to family and civil contracts being offered in April 2013.

Current civil contracts would have to be terminated early. Civil non-family contracts are due to expire in November 2013, while the new family (and family with housing) contracts start in February 2012 and expire in November 2013. If the government cannot meet the civil timetable, it can let the contracts continue to November rather than terminate early.

The Bill is now in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Delaying the inevitable?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Does the government’s new schedule for legal aid reform provide hope or just delay? Carol Storer reports

The government has announced a delay in implementing the legal aid reforms. Does this mean that it has concerns over the passage of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO) Bill? Or is it simply a sensible scheduling decision?

Originally, the government hoped to bring in the cuts in civil categories next October. However, the LASPO Bill will only become an Act at the earliest in March 2012, assuming it is passed in some shape or form. The Ministry of Justice refers to family and civil contracts being offered in April 2013.

Current civil contracts would have to be terminated early. Civil non-family contracts are due to expire in November 2013, while the new family (and family with housing) contracts start in February 2012 and expire in November 2013. If the government cannot meet the civil timetable, it can let the contracts continue to November rather than terminate early.

The Bill is now in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS

NLJ this week: Sanctions ruling casts ‘wide net’ over global finance

A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods

NLJ this week: England’s courts cement status as fraud battleground

Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide

NLJ this week: Mazur ruling puts firms on supervision alert

Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’

NLJ this week: Landlords’ forced entry powers spark legal divide

Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers

NLJ this week: Push to scrap ‘vague’ public office misconduct law

A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence

back-to-top-scroll