Delaying the inevitable?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.

16 December 2011 / Carol Storer

Issue: 7494 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus

printer

mail-detail

Does the government’s new schedule for legal aid reform provide hope or just delay? Carol Storer reports

The government has announced a delay in implementing the legal aid reforms. Does this mean that it has concerns over the passage of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO) Bill? Or is it simply a sensible scheduling decision?

Originally, the government hoped to bring in the cuts in civil categories next October. However, the LASPO Bill will only become an Act at the earliest in March 2012, assuming it is passed in some shape or form. The Ministry of Justice refers to family and civil contracts being offered in April 2013.

Current civil contracts would have to be terminated early. Civil non-family contracts are due to expire in November 2013, while the new family (and family with housing) contracts start in February 2012 and expire in November 2013. If the government cannot meet the civil timetable, it can let the contracts continue to November rather than terminate early.

The Bill is now in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Delaying the inevitable?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.

Does the government’s new schedule for legal aid reform provide hope or just delay? Carol Storer reports

The government has announced a delay in implementing the legal aid reforms. Does this mean that it has concerns over the passage of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO) Bill? Or is it simply a sensible scheduling decision?

Originally, the government hoped to bring in the cuts in civil categories next October. However, the LASPO Bill will only become an Act at the earliest in March 2012, assuming it is passed in some shape or form. The Ministry of Justice refers to family and civil contracts being offered in April 2013.

Current civil contracts would have to be terminated early. Civil non-family contracts are due to expire in November 2013, while the new family (and family with housing) contracts start in February 2012 and expire in November 2013. If the government cannot meet the civil timetable, it can let the contracts continue to November rather than terminate early.

The Bill is now in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS

NLJ this week: Mazur under scrutiny

Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’

NLJ this week: Does dishonesty always mean strike-off?

SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients

NLJ this week: Potanin, prenups & privacy

In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina

NLJ this week: Malaysia’s arbitration overhaul

The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal

NLJ this week: Greed but no fraud in £1.4bn SKAT case

In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds

back-to-top-scroll