Delaying the inevitable?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

16 December 2011 / Carol Storer

Issue: 7494 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus

printer

mail-detail

Does the government’s new schedule for legal aid reform provide hope or just delay? Carol Storer reports

The government has announced a delay in implementing the legal aid reforms. Does this mean that it has concerns over the passage of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO) Bill? Or is it simply a sensible scheduling decision?

Originally, the government hoped to bring in the cuts in civil categories next October. However, the LASPO Bill will only become an Act at the earliest in March 2012, assuming it is passed in some shape or form. The Ministry of Justice refers to family and civil contracts being offered in April 2013.

Current civil contracts would have to be terminated early. Civil non-family contracts are due to expire in November 2013, while the new family (and family with housing) contracts start in February 2012 and expire in November 2013. If the government cannot meet the civil timetable, it can let the contracts continue to November rather than terminate early.

The Bill is now in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Delaying the inevitable?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Does the government’s new schedule for legal aid reform provide hope or just delay? Carol Storer reports

The government has announced a delay in implementing the legal aid reforms. Does this mean that it has concerns over the passage of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders (LASPO) Bill? Or is it simply a sensible scheduling decision?

Originally, the government hoped to bring in the cuts in civil categories next October. However, the LASPO Bill will only become an Act at the earliest in March 2012, assuming it is passed in some shape or form. The Ministry of Justice refers to family and civil contracts being offered in April 2013.

Current civil contracts would have to be terminated early. Civil non-family contracts are due to expire in November 2013, while the new family (and family with housing) contracts start in February 2012 and expire in November 2013. If the government cannot meet the civil timetable, it can let the contracts continue to November rather than terminate early.

The Bill is now in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS

Public Accounts Committee warn of ‘extinction’ risk for legal aid

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned

NLJ this week: The insider returns

Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome

NLJ this week: Drawing the line on contempt

After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights

NLJ this week: Stop and search by the numbers

The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains

NLJ this week: Looking back on the prorogation that never was

Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously

back-to-top-scroll