header-logo header-logo

28 February 2014 / Martin Burns
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

The dependable witness

web_burns

Martin Burns provides five important factors to consider when instructing an expert witness (or acting as one)

People who act as expert witnesses perform a crucial role in judicial proceedings in the UK. Judges and other tribunals depend on their opinions in order to understand the evidence before them, and thus make informed decisions.

An onerous role

However, in recent years the role of expert witness has become more onerous and the demands of instructing parties have increased.

To an extent this can be traced back to the Supreme Court decision in Jones v Kaney [2011] UKSC 13, [2011] 2 All ER 671, which abolished immunity in negligence for expert witnesses. A consequence of this decision has been greater emphasis by instructing parties on being extra careful when deciding who would be suitable to act as expert witness.

As an institution which is regulated by Royal Charter, the primary duty of RICS is to maintain quality and ensure chartered surveyors discharge their professional duties to the highest standards. The decision in Jones v Kaney

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll