header-logo header-logo

20 December 2016
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Derogation in times of war

MPs and Peers are calling for written evidence on the government’s intention to derogate from the European Convention on Human Rights before embarking on future military operations.

The intention was announced in HC Deb 10 October 2016 WMS45, Military Operations: European Convention on Human Rights Derogation. The Joint Committee on Human Rights asked the Defence Secretary to explain why the derogation is necessary, including evidence, and to address specific questions raised by the Committee. The Defence Secretary replied that he could not answer the questions at this time as the government had only announced its intention to derogate.

The Committee is calling for submissions of no more than 3,000 words from interested groups and individuals by 31 March 2017, and has set out a list of specific questions.

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll