header-logo header-logo

06 May 2026
Issue: 8160 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Public , Local government
printer mail-detail

Devolving more control over justice issues leads to better results, research shows

Improvements to courts, tribunals and the wider justice system in the north are being held back by a lack of national and local collaboration, according to thinktank JUSTICE North

JUSTICE North, founded last year as a division of national charity JUSTICE, found a ‘siloed’ and ‘piecemeal’ approach to decision-making on justice issues despite the government’s pre-election pledge to transfer power from Westminster to regional leaders. Its inaugural report, ‘Closer to home: principles for a justice system shaped by communities’, launched last week at Broudie Jackson Canter’s Liverpool offices, found progress hampered by funding gaps and weak consultation.

Fiona Rutherford, chief executive of JUSTICE, said: ‘While there is no “one size fits all” model, locally led initiatives can and do work well.

‘They include Liverpool Crown Court which, through initiatives like encouraging plea bargains and inverting the common practice of placing less serious cases as the lowest priority, has reduced the average wait from charge to trial to 206 days. This is more than 100 days faster than the national average.’

The report also cites the Family Drug and Alcohol Court in Leeds, which is funded by the third sector, as an example of the value of locally coordinated commissioning arrangements. It saved more than £935,000 in the financial year 2023–24 as well as seeing a reduction in contested hearings and fewer children being placed into care.

Esther Leach, managing director, Broudie Jackson Canter, said: ‘Justice is the bedrock on which our society is built, yet it has remained peripheral to the devolution agenda for far too long.’

The thinktank sets out eight principles for reform in the report, including ‘meaningful local consultation’ where changes are developed with communities rather than announced and imposed, long-term funding rather than competitive bidding cycles and short-term grants, and more accessible information so cross-area comparisons can be made. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—David Ashcroft & Jessica O’Shea

WSP Solicitors—David Ashcroft & Jessica O’Shea

Commercial property and child law teams expand with senior hires

Duxton Hill Chambers—Lucas Bastin KC & Joshua Hiew

Duxton Hill Chambers—Lucas Bastin KC & Joshua Hiew

Set expands London and Singapore offering with senior international disputes hires

Gilson Gray—Gregor Duthie & Stephen Forsyth

Gilson Gray—Gregor Duthie & Stephen Forsyth

Firm strengthens real estate and litigation teams with partner promotions

NEWS
Uber has built a formidable strategy for insulating itself from liability for drivers’ conduct, but the legal terrain differs sharply between the US and England and Wales
The Civil Justice Council’s review of Part III of the Solicitors Act 1974 could mark the end of what one commentator calls an ‘outdated’ and overly technical regime governing solicitor-client fee disputes
The House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Act 2026 marks a constitutional watershed by severing the centuries-old link between hereditary titles and automatic membership of the upper chamber
Artificial intelligence, proportionality and public decision-making are under increasing judicial scrutiny, according to the latest public law round-up from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer
Families relying on informal agreements over property ownership could face costly consequences if disputes arise, the High Court has warned
back-to-top-scroll