header-logo header-logo

Diego Garcia 61 given right to come to UK

06 November 2024
Issue: 8093 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Tamil Sri Lankan asylum seekers currently being held on the island of Diego Garcia in the Chagos Archipelago are to be allowed to transfer to the UK, following legal proceedings

The 61 people, including 16 children, have spent more than three years on the island, a British territory governed by the British Indian Island Territory Administration (BIOTA). After being rescued from a leaky fishing boat by the Royal Navy, they were taken to the US military base island and have been living since in tents in a guarded compound.

The BIOT commissioner had decided the asylum seekers could be returned to Sri Lanka. However, ten of them brought a legal challenge in the BIOT supreme court, arguing the decision-making process was flawed, and claiming unlawful detention and habeas corpus. They were granted a judicial review, which was heard in September.

Judgment had been due this week. Instead, however, government legal representatives presented a letter to the court, stating: ‘Following further consideration of the position of the BIOT migrants, our clients have discussed a proposed change in policy by which all families, children and those of the unaccompanied males who do not have criminal convictions, outstanding charges or investigations would be offered the opportunity to be transferred directly to the UK.

‘Any such transfer would be subject to entry clearance applications being submitted… Work is ongoing this morning and it is expected that a decision on offering entry to the UK in this way will be reached in the next 48 hours.’

Tom Short, solicitor at Leigh Day, which is representing some of the claimants, said: ‘Our clients fled Sri Lanka seeking refuge from persecution.

‘The treatment and unlawful detention they have endured at the hands of the British Indian Ocean Territory Administration for the past three years is disgraceful. [This] decision is an enormous relief to our clients and we urge the Home Secretary to close the camp and bring our clients here without any further delay so that they can begin their recovery.’

In October, the government announced it would relinquish sovereignty of the Chagos Islands, including Diego Garcia—handing them to Mauritius.

Issue: 8093 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll