header-logo header-logo

17 May 2012
Issue: 7514 / Categories: Features , Technology
printer mail-detail

Digital v Analogue

There is no doubt that dictation saves countless hours of valuable time, but as with most technology, the future of dictation is digital.

 

Rather than recording onto physical tape, recordings are processed as digital audio files which can be distributed via any existing networks. Digital dictation provides complete workflow transparency, better utilisation of resources and optimum cost efficiency.
In 1969 the world’s first microcassette recorder, the Zuiko Pearlcorder, was produced by Olympus. It revolutionised the way lawyers worked. This was followed, in 1997, by the first professional digital recorder. Some 15 years later many lawyers are still relying on tapes, despite the fact that prices are getting steeper and tape machines and replacement parts are becoming harder to find as manufacturers stop producing analogue machines they are simply becoming rarer.
Why go digital?
Security is crucial today, especially in the legal profession. While tapes are almost impossible to protect against theft or unauthorised access, digital dictations can be encrypted and password protected. There are no lost tapes, and added features such as a biometric fingerprint
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll