header-logo header-logo

17 May 2012
Issue: 7514 / Categories: Features , Technology
printer mail-detail

Digital v Analogue

There is no doubt that dictation saves countless hours of valuable time, but as with most technology, the future of dictation is digital.

 

Rather than recording onto physical tape, recordings are processed as digital audio files which can be distributed via any existing networks. Digital dictation provides complete workflow transparency, better utilisation of resources and optimum cost efficiency.
In 1969 the world’s first microcassette recorder, the Zuiko Pearlcorder, was produced by Olympus. It revolutionised the way lawyers worked. This was followed, in 1997, by the first professional digital recorder. Some 15 years later many lawyers are still relying on tapes, despite the fact that prices are getting steeper and tape machines and replacement parts are becoming harder to find as manufacturers stop producing analogue machines they are simply becoming rarer.
Why go digital?
Security is crucial today, especially in the legal profession. While tapes are almost impossible to protect against theft or unauthorised access, digital dictations can be encrypted and password protected. There are no lost tapes, and added features such as a biometric fingerprint
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll