header-logo header-logo

26 February 2009 / Paul Christopher , Gemma Campbell
Issue: 7358 / Categories: Features , Company , Constitutional law , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Directly Liable

Directors should be wary of the new flexible approach for returning money to investors, say Paul Christopher & Gemma Campbell

Probably the most significant change from previous practice in Guernsey law under the Companies (Guernsey) Law 2008 (the Company Law), which came into effect on 1 July 2008, was the consignment to history of the concept of capital  maintenance, which was discarded in favour of a solvency model as the basis of a company’s ability to pay distributions and dividends.

To recap, the term “capital maintenance” meant that a company must raise the capital which it has stated it will raise in its memorandum and, broadly, a limited company  could not return capital to its shareholders other than in compliance with and as authorised by explicit statutory provisions. Any unauthorised returns were illegal at common law. The rules were primarily intended for the protection of the creditors. However, experience has shown to be questionable the extent to which the capital maintenance rules provided such protection, especially since there were

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll