header-logo header-logo

26 February 2009 / Paul Christopher , Gemma Campbell
Issue: 7358 / Categories: Features , Company , Constitutional law , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Directly Liable

Directors should be wary of the new flexible approach for returning money to investors, say Paul Christopher & Gemma Campbell

Probably the most significant change from previous practice in Guernsey law under the Companies (Guernsey) Law 2008 (the Company Law), which came into effect on 1 July 2008, was the consignment to history of the concept of capital  maintenance, which was discarded in favour of a solvency model as the basis of a company’s ability to pay distributions and dividends.

To recap, the term “capital maintenance” meant that a company must raise the capital which it has stated it will raise in its memorandum and, broadly, a limited company  could not return capital to its shareholders other than in compliance with and as authorised by explicit statutory provisions. Any unauthorised returns were illegal at common law. The rules were primarily intended for the protection of the creditors. However, experience has shown to be questionable the extent to which the capital maintenance rules provided such protection, especially since there were

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll