header-logo header-logo

Directly Liable

26 February 2009 / Paul Christopher , Gemma Campbell
Issue: 7358 / Categories: Features , Company , Constitutional law , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Directors should be wary of the new flexible approach for returning money to investors, say Paul Christopher & Gemma Campbell

Probably the most significant change from previous practice in Guernsey law under the Companies (Guernsey) Law 2008 (the Company Law), which came into effect on 1 July 2008, was the consignment to history of the concept of capital  maintenance, which was discarded in favour of a solvency model as the basis of a company’s ability to pay distributions and dividends.

To recap, the term “capital maintenance” meant that a company must raise the capital which it has stated it will raise in its memorandum and, broadly, a limited company  could not return capital to its shareholders other than in compliance with and as authorised by explicit statutory provisions. Any unauthorised returns were illegal at common law. The rules were primarily intended for the protection of the creditors. However, experience has shown to be questionable the extent to which the capital maintenance rules provided such protection, especially since there were

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll