header-logo header-logo

Directors cleared

08 September 2017
Issue: 7760 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Guernsey Royal Court has cleared the directors of asset management firm Carlyle Group of wrongful trading at the time of the credit crunch, in a keenly anticipated ruling. The court held the directors took reasonable commercial decisions, in Carlyle v Conway.

The claimants had argued they should have pulled out of mortgage-backed securities, including securities issued by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, earlier to prevent the fund collapsing in 2008 with losses in excess of $1bn.

Timothy Collingwood, barrister at Serle Court Chambers, said the judgment made compelling reading: `Carlyle Capital Corporation’s (CCC) business model was stress tested to withstand shocks beyond the worst of those in modern memory at the time of its launch in late 2006. In addition, the vast majority of its assets were residential mortgage backed securities issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac carrying the implicit guarantee of the US government. Neither these safeguards, nor the fact that CCC was managed by some of the sharpest financial minds around, prevented it from failing with losses in excess of $1bn as a result of the cataclysmic financial events of 2007-2008. 

`The judgment vindicates the reasonableness of the attempts that CCC’s directors and management took to try and save it, and exonerates them from allegations that they breached their duties to the company and wrongfully sought to continue trading rather than immediately winding down operations'.

Issue: 7760 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll