header-logo header-logo

22 November 2007
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Legal News , Banking
printer mail-detail

DIRTY MONEY

In brief

Businesses need to brace themselves for new money laundering rules that come into effect next month, HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) warns. The Money Laundering Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/2157)—which will apply to money service businesses (MSBs); trust or company service providers (TCSPs); high value dealers (HVDs); and accountancy service providers (ASPs)—require affected firms to put in place anti-money laundering controls. From 15 December, any new MSB, HVD or TCSP must register with HMRC before it starts trading. A register for ASPs is planned for 1 April 2008. See www.hmrc.gov.uk/mlr for guidance.

Issue: 7298 / Categories: Legal News , Banking
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll