header-logo header-logo

The disability trap

13 May 2010 / Finola Moss
Issue: 7417 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Finola Moss identifies some fundamental flaws in the care system

The recent Court of Appeal judgment in M-W (a Child) EWCA Civ 12 brought into sharp focus the vulnerability of the disabled family within care proceedings. This judgment involved a baby, whose premature birth had resulted in serious medical problems.

At 11 months old she was removed by an interim care order from her bipolar mother, despite evidence that: the mother’s support package was insufficient from day one; the parents’ tracheotomy use being “pretty impressive’’; the judge finding that, the “mother had acquitted herself well in caring for [the baby] on her own in difficult circumstances’’; and a lack of any definitive evidence of the mother’s mental condition or the harm it might cause her child.

The psychiatrist had to defer to a psychologist’s evidence that the mother might be suffering from an emotionally unstable personality disorder, the symptoms of which are, in any event , similar to bipolar. This disorder was the main cause for concern, as unlike bipolar, it was untreatable,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll