header-logo header-logo

Disabling discrimination

16 June 2016 / Karen Jackson , Spencer Keen
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7703_keen

Spencer Keen & Karen Jackson consider discrimination arising in consequence of disability

 
  • How many links can be included in the chain of causation for disability discrimination claims under EqA 2010, s 15?
  • To what extent does the disability need to be the effective cause of the treatment?

The notion of discrimination against a disabled person “because of something arising in consequence” of disability was introduced by s 15 of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) in October 2010. Unusually, the explanatory notes to EqA 2010 make explicit reference to the legislature’s attempt to reverse the legal consequences of a decision of the House of Lords: that of London Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm [2008] UKHL 43, [2008] 4 All ER 525. The notes say that, following Malcolm, the equivalent provisions of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 “no longer provided the degree of protection from disability-related discrimination that is intended for disabled people” and go on to explain that the new s 15 of EqA 2010 “is aimed at re-establishing an appropriate balance between enabling

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll