header-logo header-logo

16 June 2016 / Karen Jackson , Spencer Keen
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Disabling discrimination

nlj_7703_keen

Spencer Keen & Karen Jackson consider discrimination arising in consequence of disability

 
  • How many links can be included in the chain of causation for disability discrimination claims under EqA 2010, s 15?
  • To what extent does the disability need to be the effective cause of the treatment?

The notion of discrimination against a disabled person “because of something arising in consequence” of disability was introduced by s 15 of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) in October 2010. Unusually, the explanatory notes to EqA 2010 make explicit reference to the legislature’s attempt to reverse the legal consequences of a decision of the House of Lords: that of London Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm [2008] UKHL 43, [2008] 4 All ER 525. The notes say that, following Malcolm, the equivalent provisions of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 “no longer provided the degree of protection from disability-related discrimination that is intended for disabled people” and go on to explain that the new s 15 of EqA 2010 “is aimed at re-establishing an appropriate balance between enabling

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll