header-logo header-logo

09 August 2018 / Julian Acratopulo
Issue: 7805 / Categories: Opinion , E-disclosure , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Disclosure: take 2

nlj_7805_acratopulo

Recognition of the need for change is the key first step to effecting change, says Julian Acratopulo

The much used observation that the only thing certain about Brexit is its uncertainty, remains as applicable today as it did 12 months ago. The government’s Brexit white paper has done little to allay concerns among legal practitioners about the post-Brexit landscape.

The white paper’s Free Trade Agreement (FTA) approach to services leaves some, including the Bar Council, concerned that the UK will be forced to negotiate different bilateral agreements with the other 27 member states. The switch to a FTA could also mean that UK legal professionals lose their right to advise on both EU and UK law in the other member states and in the CJEU. Given that UK legal services sector exports are currently valued at almost £4bn per year, practitioners and the judiciary must continue to focus on ensuring the English courts will remain as attractive to international litigants as they did before Brexit.

One feature which has attracted international litigants for numerous

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll