Nicholas Dobson explains why public authority officials exercising discretion must do more than simply endorse recommendations
- A planning decision made by a local authority chief executive was unlawful because: (i) it failed to have regard to material considerations and; (ii) requisite decision reasons were not provided.
Anyone taking a decision on behalf of a public authority needs to do so with care. For this is not simply a matter of personal whim or whether the decision feels okay. Those exercising statutory discretion must do so strictly within the ambit of that discretion, having regard only to material considerations and disregarding those which are irrelevant.
Which is where Maldon Council’s chief executive and her authority came unstuck. For she had made a decision to approve matters previously reserved in outline planning consent simply by endorsing the recommendation in the report before her for reasons not explained in that report and subject to conditions within the original committee report and subsequent update which she apparently did not have. The case in question was R (Pearl) v
.tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=16d9dd3d_1)
