header-logo header-logo

15 April 2010 / Paola Fudakowska , Adam Cloherty , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7413 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Discretionary matters

Paul Hewitt, Paola Fudakowska & Adam Cloherty report from the courts

In Futter and Cutbill v Futter and HMRC [2010] EWHC 449 (Ch)
Mr Futter set up the No 3 and the No 5 Settlements of which he was entitled to the income for life. It was intended to bring both settlements onshore after 5 April 2008 which would trigger a 28.8% capital gains tax (CGT) liability. He was advised that the CGT liability on termination of the No 3 Settlement could be avoided if sufficient losses on his personal portfolio were generated and offset against the maximum “stockpiled gains” in the trust that would be attributed to him on distribution of the trust fund to him.

Section 87 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 (TCGA 1992) applies to settlements where the trustees are not resident or ordinarily resident in the UK. TCGA 1992, s 87(2) says that there shall be computed in respect of every year of assessment the amount on which the trustees would have been chargeable to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll