header-logo header-logo

Discretionary matters

15 April 2010 / Paola Fudakowska , Adam Cloherty , Paul Hewitt
Issue: 7413 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Paul Hewitt, Paola Fudakowska & Adam Cloherty report from the courts

In Futter and Cutbill v Futter and HMRC [2010] EWHC 449 (Ch)
Mr Futter set up the No 3 and the No 5 Settlements of which he was entitled to the income for life. It was intended to bring both settlements onshore after 5 April 2008 which would trigger a 28.8% capital gains tax (CGT) liability. He was advised that the CGT liability on termination of the No 3 Settlement could be avoided if sufficient losses on his personal portfolio were generated and offset against the maximum “stockpiled gains” in the trust that would be attributed to him on distribution of the trust fund to him.

Section 87 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 (TCGA 1992) applies to settlements where the trustees are not resident or ordinarily resident in the UK. TCGA 1992, s 87(2) says that there shall be computed in respect of every year of assessment the amount on which the trustees would have been chargeable to CGT

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll