header-logo header-logo

15 June 2018
Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Display pricing, solicitors told

Law firms will have to publish pricing information and display a badge highlighting protections for clients from December 2018, under regulatory proposals.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) confirmed its ‘Better Information’ plans this week. It will now seek formal approval from the Legal Services Board.  

The SRA has rowed back on previous plans to publish details of client complaints to law firms, following feedback that complaints could be misconstrued without the relevant context.

Instead, firms will need to prominently display information on prices, and what these cover, for the following services: conveyancing, probate, motoring offences, employment tribunals (claims for unfair or wrongful dismissal), immigration (excluding asylum), debt recovery (up to £100,000), employment tribunals (defending claims for unfair or wrongful dismissal) and licensing applications for business premises.

The SRA is currently developing a searchable register of solicitors and law firms for members of the public. This will include details of areas of practice and relevant regulatory matters.

Firms will also be asked to display an SRA digital badge on their website, showing the client protections available from regulated law firms.

Paul Philip, SRA Chief Executive, said: ‘People with legal problems often struggle to find clear, understandable information to help them choose the right service.

‘All the evidence shows that they do not necessarily want the cheapest provider, but they do find having information on price helps with their choices. Better information will not only help the public and small businesses, but also provide opportunities for firms to promote their individual offer and the extra customer protections you get using a regulated law firm.

‘It is a win-win for everyone.’

Research commissioned by the SRA and Legal Ombudsman, published this week, found consumers want clearer information about the cost of legal services.

Wanda Goldwag, Chair of the Office for Legal Complaints, which oversees LeO’s work, said: ‘Price transparency is extremely important, and one of the five most complained-about areas we deal with. While it is good to know that what we publish is useful to people, we support the research view that access to a wider range of information would be beneficial.’

Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll