header-logo header-logo

05 February 2009
Issue: 7355 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Disruptive technologies

Law firms should use emerging technologies to boost productivity, says Greg Wildisen

It is not that long ago that technology and lawyers seemed about as compatible as oil and water. Many saw the emergence of technologies such as email and time-recording systems as challenges to long cherished ways of working while others regarded technology as a fundamental threat to their business models. Fast forward a few years, and the picture is very different indeed. Formerly late adopters, today many law firms are now ahead of other professionals in their use of technology as they have realised the genuine benefits it can provide for a knowledge industry.

Progress
Technological progress continues unabated and a range of new tools and systems is again transforming the way that lawyers work. Law firms have already exploited technology as a means for making traditional processes—communicating with clients, time recording and workflow management, for example—much more efficient, but the deployment of information technology is now rapidly moving past this point as new technologies enter the mainstream.

Chief amongst these are so-called “collaborative” technologies

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll