header-logo header-logo

20 February 2019
Issue: 7829 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Diverse judiciary depends on diverse profession

The way to make the judiciary more diverse is to increase the number of women and black and minority ethnic (BAME) law firm partners, Lord Burnett, the Lord Chief Justice, has said.

And while sex and ethnicity are visible characteristics, the socio-economic background of candidates is often less obvious. Delivering the Treasurer’s Lecture 2019 this week at Middle Temple, Lord Burnett said: ‘It is of great concern that the legal profession appears to be over populated, particularly at the upper reaches, with people from economically privileged backgrounds. Social diversity matters too.’

He recalled that, as recently as 1991, there was a policy in the Lord Chancellor’s department of not appointing ‘openly gay judges’.

However, judges are drawn from the ranks of successful practitioners, he said, therefore diversity in the judiciary is dependent on diversity in the profession. Currently, only about a third of partners in law firms are female, and they are disproportionately situated at smaller firms. About a third of senior junior barristers of more than 15 years’ call are female, but only 15% of QCs are female.

In 2018, there were no ethnic minority judges in the Supreme Court, one judge (out of 39) in the Court of Appeal, and only three in the High Court. There were three women in the Supreme Court, nine in the Court of Appeal and 24 in the High Court.

Lord Burnett said: ‘Promoting diversity and appointing on the basis of merit are mutually reinforcing because the wider the pool the greater the availability of talent, the greater the competition for places and the greater the quality of appointments.’

Issue: 7829 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
back-to-top-scroll