header-logo header-logo

Diverse judiciary depends on diverse profession

20 February 2019
Issue: 7829 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

The way to make the judiciary more diverse is to increase the number of women and black and minority ethnic (BAME) law firm partners, Lord Burnett, the Lord Chief Justice, has said.

And while sex and ethnicity are visible characteristics, the socio-economic background of candidates is often less obvious. Delivering the Treasurer’s Lecture 2019 this week at Middle Temple, Lord Burnett said: ‘It is of great concern that the legal profession appears to be over populated, particularly at the upper reaches, with people from economically privileged backgrounds. Social diversity matters too.’

He recalled that, as recently as 1991, there was a policy in the Lord Chancellor’s department of not appointing ‘openly gay judges’.

However, judges are drawn from the ranks of successful practitioners, he said, therefore diversity in the judiciary is dependent on diversity in the profession. Currently, only about a third of partners in law firms are female, and they are disproportionately situated at smaller firms. About a third of senior junior barristers of more than 15 years’ call are female, but only 15% of QCs are female.

In 2018, there were no ethnic minority judges in the Supreme Court, one judge (out of 39) in the Court of Appeal, and only three in the High Court. There were three women in the Supreme Court, nine in the Court of Appeal and 24 in the High Court.

Lord Burnett said: ‘Promoting diversity and appointing on the basis of merit are mutually reinforcing because the wider the pool the greater the availability of talent, the greater the competition for places and the greater the quality of appointments.’

Issue: 7829 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll