header-logo header-logo

20 February 2019
Issue: 7829 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Diverse judiciary depends on diverse profession

The way to make the judiciary more diverse is to increase the number of women and black and minority ethnic (BAME) law firm partners, Lord Burnett, the Lord Chief Justice, has said.

And while sex and ethnicity are visible characteristics, the socio-economic background of candidates is often less obvious. Delivering the Treasurer’s Lecture 2019 this week at Middle Temple, Lord Burnett said: ‘It is of great concern that the legal profession appears to be over populated, particularly at the upper reaches, with people from economically privileged backgrounds. Social diversity matters too.’

He recalled that, as recently as 1991, there was a policy in the Lord Chancellor’s department of not appointing ‘openly gay judges’.

However, judges are drawn from the ranks of successful practitioners, he said, therefore diversity in the judiciary is dependent on diversity in the profession. Currently, only about a third of partners in law firms are female, and they are disproportionately situated at smaller firms. About a third of senior junior barristers of more than 15 years’ call are female, but only 15% of QCs are female.

In 2018, there were no ethnic minority judges in the Supreme Court, one judge (out of 39) in the Court of Appeal, and only three in the High Court. There were three women in the Supreme Court, nine in the Court of Appeal and 24 in the High Court.

Lord Burnett said: ‘Promoting diversity and appointing on the basis of merit are mutually reinforcing because the wider the pool the greater the availability of talent, the greater the competition for places and the greater the quality of appointments.’

Issue: 7829 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll