header-logo header-logo

26 September 2022
Issue: 7996 / Categories: Legal News , Diversity , Profession , Equality
printer mail-detail

Diversity lacking on government panels

Government legal panels are overwhelmingly lacking when it comes to ethnic diversity, according to a new report from the Bar Council.

Despite the members of the Bar broadly reflecting the ethnic makeup of the population in England and Wales, members of government legal panels—by which 3,267 barristers are employed—are disproportionately White. This is evident across the board, but becomes particularly stark at the highest levels of seniority: only three out of 77 panel silks are from ethnic minority backgrounds, and there are no Black barristers or Asian women barristers, and very few Asian men, on any of the KC panels. While White women are well-represented on panels, the report found that they do not always get equal access to the highest quality work available.

The report’s findings are disappointing given the Bar Council’s recommendations following its 2021 Race at the Bar report, which suggested monitoring panel selection with the aim of encouraging more barristers from ethnic minority backgrounds. As a result of its latest findings, the Bar Council has asked the government to commit to monitoring panel selection, work allocation and income by protected characteristics, and to publish the results within the next 12 months.

Chair of the Bar, Mark Fenhalls KC, said: ‘The findings of this report act as a stark reminder that work still needs to be done to ensure equality of opportunity at the Bar. Government legal panels have a key role to play to ensure that career advancement is open to all. 

‘We have been working closely with stakeholders across the government panels identified in this report to address future monitoring and selection practices. We know from our work with the CPS that effective work is underway to address the disparity between men and women at senior levels, and we are keen to see this good practice on diversity spread across all government panels.’

Issue: 7996 / Categories: Legal News , Diversity , Profession , Equality
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll