header-logo header-logo

Diversity lacking on government panels

26 September 2022
Issue: 7996 / Categories: Legal News , Diversity , Profession , Equality
printer mail-detail

Government legal panels are overwhelmingly lacking when it comes to ethnic diversity, according to a new report from the Bar Council.

Despite the members of the Bar broadly reflecting the ethnic makeup of the population in England and Wales, members of government legal panels—by which 3,267 barristers are employed—are disproportionately White. This is evident across the board, but becomes particularly stark at the highest levels of seniority: only three out of 77 panel silks are from ethnic minority backgrounds, and there are no Black barristers or Asian women barristers, and very few Asian men, on any of the KC panels. While White women are well-represented on panels, the report found that they do not always get equal access to the highest quality work available.

The report’s findings are disappointing given the Bar Council’s recommendations following its 2021 Race at the Bar report, which suggested monitoring panel selection with the aim of encouraging more barristers from ethnic minority backgrounds. As a result of its latest findings, the Bar Council has asked the government to commit to monitoring panel selection, work allocation and income by protected characteristics, and to publish the results within the next 12 months.

Chair of the Bar, Mark Fenhalls KC, said: ‘The findings of this report act as a stark reminder that work still needs to be done to ensure equality of opportunity at the Bar. Government legal panels have a key role to play to ensure that career advancement is open to all. 

‘We have been working closely with stakeholders across the government panels identified in this report to address future monitoring and selection practices. We know from our work with the CPS that effective work is underway to address the disparity between men and women at senior levels, and we are keen to see this good practice on diversity spread across all government panels.’

Issue: 7996 / Categories: Legal News , Diversity , Profession , Equality
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Commercial disputes practice bolstered by partner hire

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

London competition team expands with collective actions specialist hire

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Commercial dispute resolution team in London welcomes partner

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll