header-logo header-logo

Diversity lacking on government panels

26 September 2022
Issue: 7996 / Categories: Legal News , Diversity , Profession , Equality
printer mail-detail

Government legal panels are overwhelmingly lacking when it comes to ethnic diversity, according to a new report from the Bar Council.

Despite the members of the Bar broadly reflecting the ethnic makeup of the population in England and Wales, members of government legal panels—by which 3,267 barristers are employed—are disproportionately White. This is evident across the board, but becomes particularly stark at the highest levels of seniority: only three out of 77 panel silks are from ethnic minority backgrounds, and there are no Black barristers or Asian women barristers, and very few Asian men, on any of the KC panels. While White women are well-represented on panels, the report found that they do not always get equal access to the highest quality work available.

The report’s findings are disappointing given the Bar Council’s recommendations following its 2021 Race at the Bar report, which suggested monitoring panel selection with the aim of encouraging more barristers from ethnic minority backgrounds. As a result of its latest findings, the Bar Council has asked the government to commit to monitoring panel selection, work allocation and income by protected characteristics, and to publish the results within the next 12 months.

Chair of the Bar, Mark Fenhalls KC, said: ‘The findings of this report act as a stark reminder that work still needs to be done to ensure equality of opportunity at the Bar. Government legal panels have a key role to play to ensure that career advancement is open to all. 

‘We have been working closely with stakeholders across the government panels identified in this report to address future monitoring and selection practices. We know from our work with the CPS that effective work is underway to address the disparity between men and women at senior levels, and we are keen to see this good practice on diversity spread across all government panels.’

Issue: 7996 / Categories: Legal News , Diversity , Profession , Equality
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll